Concerns of Parents

How do parents and community members who support the Coalition answer the question:
"What is your greatest concern about bias in SVSD schools?"

(Check back - this page will be updated as we get new comments from supporters.)

1

A parent says:   I am concerned that my children are picking up opinions on political and moral issues that are based on the personal opinions of their teachers. We have not discussed these issues in depth at home, so my children don't have the background to understand how to think about the teacher's opinion. They usually end up assuming the teacher is right, since the teacher is usually the source of accurate information. Teachers SHOULD NOT be using their position to indoctrinate students to their opinions and beliefs.

2

A parent says:   Day of Silence, Neutrality in classroom

3

A parent says:   It seems to me that students who are not fully engaged in the honoring of sexual choices or left wing political views are being singled out and in fact being subjected to prejudicial behavior. This in itself is contradictory and hypocritical in the face of those who claim there is mistreatment due to sexual preference. Our board members and superintendent need to take a stand to remedy the situation and put our children's education in the forefront.

4

A parent says:   a few teachers who have personal agendas, the ones that we have been battling in the high school and one that I am trying to finish my letter about in SMS.

5

A parent says:   

1. Teachers using classroom time to push biased social/political agendas.

2. Admin. setting aside public school time to forward a biased social agenda (Day of Silence, Week of Bullying) and forcing all students to participate.

3. Teachers who act like parents (feel the need to protect one group of students over another group).

4. Bias in library (displays, books)

5. Teachers disrespect of authority.

6

A parent says:   My biggest concern is the day of silence activity, an overt political protest with no allowance for opposing viewpoints. There are several teachers who actively state their political and spiritual points of view in the classroom; this bothers me as well. I believe in freedom of speech, but it seems the teachers have undue influence.

7

A parent says:   Right now it is the disrespectful and rude actions of a few teachers at the Martin Luther King assembly at MT SI.

8

A parent says:   I am very concerned about how some teachers feel they can say and behave anyway they wish in front of our children and believe it is okay. I'm tired of our children being afraid of being berated by their teachers for being themselves.

9

A parent says:   That my children will feel criticized for speaking or even holding their own personal beliefs. Teachers or other staff using tolerance to push their own political or social agenda while being intolerant to my children's point of view.

10

A parent says:   Teachers should teach the subject, not use the school to spread their personal agenda. Also, it seems as if the school has gone too far with this day of silence, and by keeping our kids out of school that day, they will just be graded down.

11

A parent says:   My greatest concern regarding the SVSD schools is that political, religious, and social opinions are proposed in such a way, as to encourage the students to make a choice for or against situations and opinions that have nothing to do with education, and do not want my tax dollars to be spent in such a way.

12

A community member says:   Unequal representation. The GSA has taken over the school and all efforts to create a bible study group has been met with extreme resistence.

13

A parent says:   I am concerned about the indoctrination of our children into others social, political, and moral (or lack thereof) beliefs instead of focusing on reading, writing, math, etc. (the fundamentals of education).

14

A parent says:   That liberal and left leaning dogma is not allowing free speech and thought in Mt. Si high school. Kids with a Christian worldview are silenced, made fun of or otherwise marginalized. Public school teachers are paid to teach content related the curriculum being offered, not promote their beliefs and put other down who disagree with them.

15

A parent says:   I have two primary concerns, and I'm not sure I can pick the most important. First, an indication of a talented teacher is his/her ability to understand and teach multiple and/or opposing aspects of an issue so convincingly that students don't have a feel for what the teachers personal opinion of the matter is. We have many talented teachers in this district, but the mediocrity of several teachers is poisoning the reputation of our high school, poisoning public perception of the teachers generally, and left unchecked, they have undue influence over our children. Second, I can't stand the idea of my children being harassed by adults entrusted with the privilege of educating kids. Children should be corrected by teachers and administration for poor behavior, poor performance or participation in the learning process. However, children should not be shamed by teachers for what they think or believe--their peers do enough of that as it is.

16

A parent says:   That our teachers don't interject their personal views and opinions in the classroom. That they present the facts like a journalist and facilitate a conversation but leave their own opinions out of it.

17

A parent says:    I want to protect the classroom setting as a neutral environment where children can learn, grow and feel supported.

18

A parent says:   I see the loudest teachers (who are the minority and most liberal) being given preference over the majority. This bias is creating division and chaos at Mt Si High School.

19

A parent says:   My greatest concern is biased representation among educators and staff with regard to standard operating procedures. There is an OBVIOUS disregard to the thoughts and feelings of anyone that has an opposing view to this day of silence. I am saddened by this and would like to do my part in making positive changes toward equal rights within our educational system.

20

A parent says:   The disruptive distraction that is created by such overt social and political motivations, directly imposed by the staff, which in turn robs our students of the education that each of us, as taxpayers, are funding and expecting our kids to receive. Secondarily, the hypocricy of the bias, while using terms for others such as intolerant and narrow-minded, when in fact this is the message that is being exhibited and embodied by these teachers. The issue is not to impart my belief system in the minds of the teachers or even change their beliefs, it is to keep the teaching staff from imparting their belief system in the mind of my child and, further, actually inhibit my child from developing a healthy, confident, cognitive ability to question, challenge, and wrestle with key moral, ethical, political, and social issues and viewpoints, simply because they may differ from those held by that specific teacher Fundamentally, our educators need to get back to the basics of educating..

21

A parent says:   SVSD is allowing the agendas of certain interest groups have a foothold in Snoqualmie Valley schools. Those agendas are in direct conflict with traditional family values and what my families believes to be morally right.

22

A parent says:   SVSD is allowing teachers and certain activist groups to try to mislead students against traditional family values. Their messages have nothing to due with true education.

23

A parent says:   The over crowding at the HS level and the negative impact that has on our students. Bigger crowds make for less space, less supervision, less time for students to receive p.e., library and so on.

24

A parent says:   The teachers should adhere to the rules and mission of the school just as they expect the students to do.

25

A parent says:   Day of Silence, Neutrality in the Classroom, Agendas

26

A parent says:   The example of poor behavior by our teachers. The fact that when the teachers behave badly the students don't see the teachers face consequences like the students would. This may lead them to think, mistakenly, that adults don't have to pay for their mistakes.

27

A parent says:   That some bias is encouraged and other bias is suppressed. We need an intentionally articulated approach to what it is that we want to teach our students.

28

A parent says:   Replacing emphasis on reading writing, math and real science and replacing it with politically correct Al Gore videos and liberal life and political philosophy.

29

A parent says:   I believe that I, as a parent, should be the first and foremost teacher of our child, especially in the area of life's values. It disturbs me that teachers, who have so much influence in our children's lives, can undermine what we teach at home in areas that have nothing to do with basic education.

30

A parent says:   that my families values will be imposed upon by teachers personal and private agenda and that my childrens grades will be affected if they do not agree with their views, which could hurt them getting into certain colleges due to a lower GPA.

31

A parent says:   To have the teacher's at SVSD schools to personally emulate the characteristics and virtues that they are expecting from the students. My daughter at Mt. Si High School came home one day and said that a teacher flipped off one of the students. I am hoping that this behavior would not be accepted from a student to a teacher, and that there would be appropriate disciplinary measures taken; AND I would expect the same consequences for the teacher as well, IF, we are going to teach our children the value of taking responsiblity for one's actions

32

A parent says:   I just want education presented without a personal or political agenda. I don't want to know, or my children to know, the sexual preferences or activities of anyone employed by the school district.

33 A parent says:   That holding onto traditional family values now seems to equate to intolerance.
34 A community member says:   I am concerned that things will be MUCH worse by the time my kids enter the school system, and I'd like to do what I can to "stem the tide". We should have schools where the focus is on the "3 R's", and not a tool for shaping the political and social value. "Religious" instruction belongs at home -- it is not a topic the school should breach... same for "Politics" and "Social Values". I would like to help ensure that schools stick to Reading, Writing, and Arithmetic, and leave the ancillary topics where they belong - OUTSIDE of the school environment.
35 A parent says:   My children getting a biased education.
36 A parent says:   I am especially concerned about the prevalence of witchcraft and anti Christian attitudes and actions at MSHS.
37 A parent says:   That the basic freedom of learning to think and act for one's self will be lost. Independent thinking is one of the highest goals of education.
38 A parent says:   Teachers are free to "teach" their personal views to our students. Many of the teachers are clearly anti Christian.
39 A parent says:   My greatest concern about bias in the SVSD schools is that educators at the high school (and other schools?) are abusing the rights of people's individual beliefs to influence their education. This is completely wrong. Given recent events, the hypocrisy surrounding the notion of tolerance is absurd. To instill fear or pressure students to quiet their own beliefs is unacceptable. As well, to force students to compromise their beliefs in order to be successful in the classroom is nothing less than an immature bullying tactic. Teachers have a defined purpose in the classroom. They have to be held accountable to maintain established boundaries and focus on their given task at hand. Teachers must practice fairness, acceptance and tolerance. There can be no exception tied to their position.
40 A community member says:   SVSD has allowed political and moral views of any kind to become more dominate than basic education.
41 A MSHS graduate says:   When I was at Mount Si for the first year of the Day of Silence it did honestly have one good affect for me and that was that it brought attention to my use of derogatory terms like "that's so gay" or "your retarded". It did bring this to my attention and made me realize it was something that I needed to change. However, this was clearly not the case for the majority of the student body. Most students felt that the Day of Silence was thrown upon them and that they had no say in the matter. Consider what Robert Frost once said, “Education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper or your self-confidence.” When I was at Mount Si the Day of Silence had the reverse affects of this. Infact, those students that disagreed with the cause felt it necessary to be even louder and shout and make as much noise whenever possible. Now I graduated in '06 and can't say I know exactly how the school is now but I hear complaints from both sides and it just seems to be getting worse. Clearly, with all the problems, bickering, verbal abuse (whatever you want to call it) the the Day of Silence is not creating an environment that is creating or encouraging any form of positive communication between the two parties. Let's get back to the focus as to why students really are supposed to go to school...education, not frustration.
42 A community member says:   From all I have heard about what goes on at MSHS, I know one thing for sure. Washington State has harassment laws against this sort of thing. This would not be tolerated in my work place. A student is not to be made to feel threatened in any way for having a different point of view, especially from those in authority over them. I can't believe these staff members still have their jobs after the MLK assembly. They would've been fired in my work place. What's it going to take? A class-action lawsuit against the school district & the state?
43 A community member says:   The Day of Silence needs to be banned. It has nothing to do with the 3R's and the same accomodations were not given to the Day of Prayer. You can't take sides and have one and not the other so go neutral and have neither one.
44 A MSHS graduate says:   I left Mt Si and went to Running start because the atmosphere at mt Si is not conducive to learning. By the way, nice $17,000,000 football stadium...
45 A parent says:   I would like more information about what is going on in the schools, where their priorities are, if they are teaching values that I think are important, and when they are wasting students time with their personal issues.
46 A parent says:   My greatest concern is that my children are not receiving an education anywhere near the level I received. Core subjects are not thoroughly covered. Too much time is spent on non-education related topics.
47 A parent says:   I am mostly concerned with the recent events at Mt Si concerning the "Day of Silence". I don't think it is acceptable to push a political agenda on our children at a public school where our tax dollars are paying the way.
48 A parent says:   That my kids know too much about their teachers' politics, and the lack of daily teaching. It seems like they are babysat with movies more than they are taught by the teacher.
49 A community member says:   I am concerned about recent events at Mount Si High School. It has come to my attention that the schools overly conservative attitude, especially toward the GSA, is creating a closed-minded environment. Diversity education and awareness are highly important in our schools, and such information should not be censored for students. As a current University of Washington student, I am shocked of the controversy and intolerance that has come about regarding the GLBTQ community. At UW we are open to all groups and there is even a Diversity Minor! Students should be informed about such topics, or they will be completely ignorant when they go off to college and enter the real world.
50 A parent says:   Our schools are not a place that everyone can feel free to express their views. Our conservative views as a family are being eroded by our teachers and staff are saying and displaying. Our kids are learning disrespect for authority, which can only lead to problems in later life when the real world comes at them. This is not a college campus, our children are minors. As a government institution, we need to demand more from our Schools. It is embarrassing to say my kids go to Mt. Si High School.
51 A parent says:   sexual preference does not belong in our schools....
52 A parent says:   My son Graduated in 2006. I was shocked by the conversations he had with teachers. I kept my mouth shut to avoid confrontation. I will not be silent anymore.
53 A parent says:   Reverse discrimination - lack of tolerance for religion of any type
54 A parent says:   Political banter in the classrooms - keep it neutral!
55 A parent says:   Inappropriate socialization that has absolutely nothing to do with reading, writing, and arithmetic. The country wonders why our youth are internationally undereducated... these type of socialization indoctrination programs such as "Day of Silence" are part of that answer. It is not the job of the teachers to teach their social views to our children. As parents, that is our obligation. School is for learning the universal fundamentals.
56 A parent says:  That the policies that support all the diversity at Mt. Si do not cover my daughter and our families Christian views. She is taught evolution as fact. The fact that certain teachers are allowed to exhibit poor manners and no tact for their own political agendas is a grave concern to me.
57 A parent says:  I want my children to be able to make their own informed decisions, without pressure to conform to one group or another.  I do not want them distracted from their education by ignorant, uninformed bullies or "office politics".
58 A parent says:  That all life styles are valued except "Christian values".
59 A community member says:   My children's beliefs are/will not be honored as other students' lifestyles/beliefs are. The alternative lifestyle glorified and everything else criticized. Parent concerns dismissed. My 3 kids do not attend here and never will until there are drastic changes.  If my children were to attend, the would be isolated for their non-conformity to 'politically correct' agendas. I also am concerned for the dismissal of parental concern by school staff and board members regarding such days as the day of silence at the high school.
60 A parent says:  It is a huge concern that public school teachers could or would use their position of authority over our students to promote political issues, personal values and beliefs, and to victimize our children over their own values, beliefs and religion. -this should not be happening!
61 A parent says:  I am concerned about the numerous incidents of teacher behavior, especially at Mount Si High School and Snoqualmie Middle School. My children are not of middle school age yet, but unless things change we will move out of the district to one of the better districts on the East side.
62 A parent says:  Public school is or was put in place to provide our children with a higher education -- this strengthens and prospers our society and our nation.  No extra-curricular activity or club should be allowed to interfere with this fundamental purpose.  The current Mount Si High School administration does not understand their role as administrators i.e to ensure our kids are educated, and have allowed one specific club to influence a specific agenda.  My husband and I have had discussions with the principal and vice-principal over the last 2 years, but to no avail.  They just don't get it. 
63 A parent says:  Religious, political and social issues should not be promoted during class time.
64 A parent says:  Public schools are not the place for this debate. First and foremost, a quality education and constant improvement in that area should be the focus of the administration. Anything that impairs or inhibits that primary goal should be immediately remedied by the district. MSHS administration is more worried about "being seen" than about the education they provide the students.
65 A parent says:  I have a student going in to 9th grade for the 2008-09 school year and after reading and talking to students about the Day of Silence I am very concerned about the quality of education that is being presented to our children. I have no problem with homosexuality however, I don't think the school is the appropriate place for this platform. School should be for education not sexual preference representation. I agree that people that are different should not be bullied however, shouldn’t this should apply to all people who are different, not ONLY the gay/lesbian students? There are all kinds of students that are bullied in school and they don’t get a Day of Silence. Where is the advocacy board for the “shy skinny kids” group or the “fat kids” etc. Where exactly do we draw the line?

How would you answer this question?  Tell us when you become a supporter of the Coalition to Defend Education.

Copyright © 2008 Coalition to Defend Education. All rights reserved.